Take Action: Tell your senators to reject harmful cuts to health care!
When people consider enrolling in Medicare Advantage (MA) plans, one of their major tools is Medicare Plan Finder (MPF). This tool allows people to compare the plans available in their zip code, including being able to enter prescription drug information to get a rough idea of what their costs will be for the year.
MPF is useful, but it has some glaring weaknesses. Currently, if a person is interested in a plan and has a provider they want to keep seeing, they must leave the MPF tool and go to the plan’s website, call the plan directly, or call their provider to ask if they are in the plan’s network.
Currently, if a person is interested in a plan and has a provider they want to keep seeing, they must leave the MPF tool.
In addition, MPF does not show detailed information on supplemental benefits. As Medicare Rights and Justice in Aging recently highlighted, MPF displays detailed information only for dental, hearing, and vision coverage. Other benefits only get high-level treatment like “some coverage” or “not covered.”
In our cluttered MA landscape, with various enrollment and access barriers and complications, these omissions can make the search for a good plan fit ever more difficult.
In late 2024, the Biden-Harris administration proposed a rule that would have required MA plans to submit directory information so the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) could incorporate it into MPF. We strongly supported this change in our comments, as well as related proposals that would have required plans to attest to the accuracy of the directory information and that it and the underlying network complied with network adequacy rules. Unfortunately, the incoming Trump administration chose not to finalize these provisions.
In a surprising twist, CMS announced last month that it will be updating MPF to allow beneficiaries to search by provider and see directory information on the MPF site. Some plan types would be included automatically, while others are permitted, but not required, to submit directory information.
For supplemental benefits, CMS plans to update MPF to show additional details for benefits beyond dental, hearing, and vision and to add new types of benefits to the list shown for each plan.
CMS plans to update MPF to show additional details for benefits beyond dental, hearing, and vision.
CMS plans for both the directory and supplemental benefits changes to be in effect for the upcoming Fall Open Enrollment.
At Medicare Rights, we applaud these plans and encourage CMS to go further. While these updates will help many people with Medicare make better choices for their coverage, more still must be done to ensure provider directories are accurate. Historically, they are riddled with errors that may disguise inadequate networks and inferior access to care. If MPF uses inaccurate information, the problems will increase.
For supplemental benefits, we urge CMS to allow users to filter by benefit and display benefits in a way that allows users to compare plans by coverage for specific needs.
We also continue to urge all policymakers to prioritize funding State Health Insurance Assistance Programs (SHIPs). These programs provide trained, objective, and one-on-one services to help people learn about their options and make the right enrollment decisions for their circumstances.
Read more about the longstanding issue of inaccurate provider directories.
Read more about the need for more information about supplemental benefits.
We welcome thoughtful, respectful discussion on our website. To maintain a safe and constructive environment, comments that include profanity or violent, threatening language will be hidden. We may ban commentors who repeatedly cross these guidelines.
Donate today and make a lasting impact.
Sign up to receive Medicare news, policy developments, and other useful updates from the Medicare Rights.
View this profile on InstagramMedicare Rights Center (@medicarerights) • Instagram photos and videos
2 Comments on “Important Medicare Plan Finder Improvements Planned This Fall, More Work Needed”
Sue M.
September 11, 2025 at 5:34 pmThis is a good idea. But for a number of reasons, I’ll *never* take any Medicare Advantage plan. I prefer my Plan G Medicare supplement, Part D drug plan, and private standalone vision and dental insurance.
Lisa M
September 15, 2025 at 9:53 amThis is a good idea, and I applaud it, but didn’t the ACA require insurance companies to keep updated lists of network providers and facilities? That didn’t last long. Oversight, if it ever existed, seems to have evaporated, leaving *former* providers, etc. as “in network” on the carriers’ websites.
The responsibility to keep accurate records of participating providers and facilities should, necessarily, fall to the insurer. After all, they credential every participant. Do they keep the lists current? Not really. That has given rise to what has been reported as the “ghost network” of in network resources.
It is completely unfair, and just plain wrong, to expect members to be able to successfully choose a care team.