General Comments
As with all models that could change how people with Medicare access, pay for, or understand their health care, the first step is to ensure that all beneficiaries have the same consumer protections, including limitations on balance billing, conditions on private contracting, and no increase to out-ofpocket costs. We are heartened to see the RFI reiterate that Medicare FFS beneficiaries aligned to DCEs participating in the Geographic PBP model option would retain all of their Original Medicare benefits, including freedom of choice of any Medicare provider or supplier, even if the provider or supplier does not have an arrangement with the DCE.
As with all models that are based on increasing consumerism and shopping, this model must have strong guardrails and fail-safes to ensure that the choices beneficiaries make cannot lead to catastrophic outcomes for their health or financial stability. Overemphasis on shopping can create a system where only the savviest consumers get a reasonable deal and everyone else struggles to get their needs met. More must be done to protect against this risk.
While we were pleased to see that CMS sought feedback through the initial RFI and later stakeholder engagement and appreciated the opportunity to respond to the initial RFI, it is unclear whether beneficiaries and their representatives have continued to play a role in the design process. As we stated in the RFI and in our “Consumer Protections in New Medicare Payment and Delivery Models: A Checklist,” with the AARP Public Policy Institute, models need early and ongoing input from consumer stakeholders to ensure important considerations are part of their very foundations.1
Beneficiaries, families, caregivers, and advocates can provide insights into how to effectively and appropriately communicate with patients, ensure that model evaluation draws on metrics relevant to patients and their families, and help identify ways to avoid inappropriate consumer incentives…
Comments: Direct Contracting—Geographic Population-Based Payment Model Option
General Comments
As with all models that could change how people with Medicare access, pay for, or understand their health care, the first step is to ensure that all beneficiaries have the same consumer protections, including limitations on balance billing, conditions on private contracting, and no increase to out-ofpocket costs. We are heartened to see the RFI reiterate that Medicare FFS beneficiaries aligned to DCEs participating in the Geographic PBP model option would retain all of their Original Medicare benefits, including freedom of choice of any Medicare provider or supplier, even if the provider or supplier does not have an arrangement with the DCE.
As with all models that are based on increasing consumerism and shopping, this model must have strong guardrails and fail-safes to ensure that the choices beneficiaries make cannot lead to catastrophic outcomes for their health or financial stability. Overemphasis on shopping can create a system where only the savviest consumers get a reasonable deal and everyone else struggles to get their needs met. More must be done to protect against this risk.
While we were pleased to see that CMS sought feedback through the initial RFI and later stakeholder engagement and appreciated the opportunity to respond to the initial RFI, it is unclear whether beneficiaries and their representatives have continued to play a role in the design process. As we stated in the RFI and in our “Consumer Protections in New Medicare Payment and Delivery Models: A Checklist,” with the AARP Public Policy Institute, models need early and ongoing input from consumer stakeholders to ensure important considerations are part of their very foundations.1
Beneficiaries, families, caregivers, and advocates can provide insights into how to effectively and appropriately communicate with patients, ensure that model evaluation draws on metrics relevant to patients and their families, and help identify ways to avoid inappropriate consumer incentives…
Reference
Recent Documents
Testimony: Legislative Proposals to Support Patient Access to Telehealth Services
Comments on the 2025 Advance Notice
Comments Supporting the Complete Rescission of the 2018 Association Health Plan Final Rule
Comments on Proposed Changes to Medicare Advantage and Part D for 2025
Statement for the Record on Medicare Advantage Marketing and the Enrollee Experience
Medicare Prescription Payment Plan (MPPP) Draft Guidance
Any changes to the Medicare program must aim for healthier people, better care, and smarter spending—not paying more for less. As policymakers debate the future of health care, we will provide our insights here.
Thinking ahead to Medicare's future, it’s important to modernize benefits and pursue changes that improve how people with Medicare navigate their coverage on a daily basis. Here are our evolving 30 policy goals for Medicare’s future.
You can help protect and strengthen Medicare by taking action on the important issues we are following, subscribe to newsletter alerts, or follow along on social media. Any way you choose to get involved is a contribution that we appreciate greatly.