In Improving Care Coordination, the case study contrasts the consequences of weak versus effective care coordination across Medicare and Medicaid. Ms. T’s experience shows how limited integration and inadequate plan support can lead to improper billing, unresolved provider issues, and ultimately a disruption in care when her therapist drops her. In contrast, Mr. Y’s story demonstrates how strong care coordination within a fully integrated plan can proactively protect access to critical services, including uninterrupted 24-hour home care. Together, these examples highlight the essential role of care coordination in reducing administrative burden, preventing care disruptions, and improving outcomes for dually eligible individuals.
Read More
In Stopping Coverage Loss and Disruption, the case study focuses on “churn,” or the loss and regaining of coverage, and how it can interrupt care and destabilize integrated plans. Mrs. E’s experience shows how administrative errors in Medicaid recertification can lead to the loss of both Medicaid and integrated D-SNP coverage, resulting in higher costs, missed care, and fragmented services. Mr. V’s story highlights how misleading marketing and confusion about plan options can push beneficiaries out of highly integrated coverage into less coordinated plans, putting critical services like home care at risk. Together, these cases underscore the need for stronger safeguards, clearer communication, and streamlined processes to prevent unnecessary coverage disruptions and protect access to care.
Read More
In Closing Gaps in Benefits and Services, the case study examines how differences in Medicare and Medicaid coverage rules, vendors, and plan structures can create barriers to essential services like transportation. Mrs. W’s experience shows how limited integration and misleading expectations around supplemental benefits can leave beneficiaries with less access to care than before, while Mr. L’s story demonstrates how more aligned or integrated plans can simplify access and reduce administrative burdens. Together, these examples highlight the need for clearer plan information, stronger oversight of supplemental benefits, and greater alignment between Medicare and Medicaid to ensure beneficiaries receive the services they need.
Read More
In Fixing the Appeals Process, the case study contrasts two beneficiary experiences to show how fragmented versus integrated systems impact access to care. Mr. H’s story illustrates the confusion and delays that arise when Medicare and Medicaid appeals operate separately, leaving him caught between two plans and unsure how to secure coverage for a medically necessary wheelchair feature. In contrast, Mrs. Z benefits from an integrated appeals system that streamlines decision-making and reduces administrative burden, ultimately improving her access to needed services. Together, these examples underscore the importance of aligning Medicare and Medicaid processes and inform policy recommendations aimed at simplifying appeals and strengthening care coordination.
Read More
Agents and brokers for MA plans receive commissions per enrollment and often receive additional “administrative” bonuses that balloon MA spending. These financial incentives drive aggressive and misleading marketing aimed at people looking for coverage. As a result, beneficiaries fall into the “MA Trap,” finding themselves enrolled in an MA plan that doesn’t meet their needs and without an efficient way to switch back to Original Medicare.
Read More
As the cost of care rises, beneficiaries increasingly look for plans that promise discounts or additional benefits. MA plans take advantage of this and flood potential beneficiaries with marketing calls, mailers, ads, and even in-person solicitation that can be deceptive and easily misunderstood.
Read More
Original Medicare has significant gaps in coverage, including very limited coverage of dental, vision, and hearing care. By advertising supplemental benefits that seem to fill these gaps and help tackle the cost of care and living, MA plans captivate the attention of beneficiaries struggling to afford care. But these benefits are not standardized or clearly communicated, falling short of their original promises.
Read More
To make it clear what a difference MSP enrollment can have in the lives of older adults and people with disabilities, and to support advocacy efforts to expand MSP eligibility and enrollment, Medicare Rights has compiled a set of case studies from its national helpline. These cases show what obstacles beneficiaries commonly face when trying to enroll and stay enrolled in MSPs and reinforce the role the benefit plays in real people’s lives.
Read More
In recent years, insurance companies have flooded the MA market with plans that are difficult to tell apart, creating overwhelm and confusion that costs both beneficiaries and the Medicare program more than Original Medicare. This part addresses the causes and consequences of the rapid proliferation of Medicare Advantage (MA) plans in the absence of adequate consumer guidance and federal regulation.
Read More
This part of the series explores the origins and structure of Medicare financing. Through an issue brief, infographic, and video, it outlines the various sources of funding for the three major parts of Medicare and lays out how projections and costs have fluctuated over the program’s history.
Read More
